PULSE: Risk models for cardiovascular disease could be misleading, finds study

Press/Media: Research

Description

Current risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease may be misleading at the individual level because of large variations in practice data, a study has found.

Analysis of records from 3.6 million patients across 392 GP practices found considerable variability in the quality of data available.

The study, by a team at University of Manchester, showed that for a QRISK3 predicted score of 10%, an individual patient could have a risk of between 7.2% and 13.7%, depending which practice they came from.

Period21 Aug 2019

Media contributions

1

Media contributions

  • TitleRisk models for cardiovascular disease could be misleading, finds study
    Media name/outletPulse
    Media typeWeb
    Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
    Date21/08/19
    DescriptionCurrent risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease may be misleading at the individual level because of large variations in practice data, a study has found.

    Analysis of records from 3.6 million patients across 392 GP practices found considerable variability in the quality of data available.

    The study, by a team at University of Manchester, showed that for a QRISK3 predicted score of 10%, an individual patient could have a risk of between 7.2% and 13.7%, depending which practice they came from.
    URLwww.pulsetoday.co.uk/clinical/clinical-specialties/cardiovascular/risk-models-for-cardiovascular-disease-could-be-misleading-finds-study/20039214.article
    PersonsTjeerd Van Staa

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • medical risk