A pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the non-inferiority of counselling for depression versus cognitive-behaviour therapy for patients in primary care meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): Study protocol for a [...]

David Saxon (Contributor)
Kate Ashley (Contributor)
Lindsey Bishop-Edwards (Contributor)
Janice Connell (Contributor)
Phillippa Harrison (Contributor)
Sally Ohlsen (Contributor)
Gillian E. Hardy (Contributor)
Stephen Kellett (Contributor)
Clara Mukuria (Contributor)
Toni Mank (Contributor)
Peter Bower (Contributor)
Mike Bradburn (Contributor)
John Brazier (Contributor)
Robert Elliott (Contributor)
Lynne Gabriel (Contributor)
Michael King (Contributor)
Stephen Pilling (Contributor)
Sue Shaw (Contributor)
Glenn Waller (Contributor)
Michael Barkham (Contributor)

Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (L5)

Dataset

1 Article

1 results

2017
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the non-inferiority of counselling for depression versus cognitive-behaviour therapy for patients in primary care meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Saxon, D., Ashley, K., Bishop-Edwards, L., Connell, J., Harrison, P., Ohlsen, S., Hardy, G. E., Kellett, S., Mukuria, C., Mank, T., Bower, P., Bradburn, M., Brazier, J., Elliott, R., Gabriel, L., King, M., Pilling, S., Shaw, S., Waller, G. & Barkham, M., 1 Mar 2017, In: Trials. 18, 1, 93.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access