Narrative
This case study covers two research projects undertaken at the University of Manchester (UoM) which had unprecedented access to the immigration appeals system, both impacting on asylum policy. The first project focused on family visitor appeals and showed that the introduction of a fee was not a significant deterrent to accessing the appeals process. The second project on asylum appeals made a number of recommendations concerning the handling of appeals by the Tribunal, and the reporting of its decisions.The research on family visitor appeals was the basis for a Ministry of Justice consultation paper in 2010, and was directly cited by the government when introducing fees for immigration appeals. The research on asylum appeals has influenced policy and thinking within the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), with particular regard to the Tribunal's management of its country guidance system. More recently, following a presentation of this research to Tribunal members, a new ‘Guidance Note’ on the reporting of cases was produced.
Impact date | 2014 |
---|---|
Category of impact | Legal impacts, Economic impacts, Political impacts, Societal impacts |
Impact level | Benefit |
Related content
-
Research output
-
Consistency in asylum adjudication: Country guidance and the asylum process in the United Kingdom
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Immigration Appeals for Family Visitors Refused Entry Clearance
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals: A Study of Tribunal Adjudication
Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review
-
Family Visitor Appeals: an evaluation of the decision to appeal and disparities in success rates by appeal type
Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report › peer-review