Interdisciplinary Systematic Review: Mechanistic Evidence and Epistemic Justice

Project Details

Description

What is the best way to evaluate whether an intervention works? Orthodox ‘evidence-based’ evaluation methods review certain kinds of studies (especially randomised trials) but exclude other relevant evidence (such as mechanistic studies and views of stakeholders).

This project will apply an emerging philosophical theory of causal enquiry, Evidential Pluralism, to provide systematic foundations for a broader approach to evidence review—one that includes a diverse range of evidence from across disciplines. This approach promises better informed and more inclusive evaluations. A new review of the effectiveness of face-mask mandates will help to test the approach.

The project is co-led by Trish Greenhalgh (Oxford) and Rebecca Helm (Exeter).
StatusActive
Effective start/end date16/01/2515/01/27

UN Sustainable Development Goals

In 2015, UN member states agreed to 17 global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all. This project contributes towards the following SDG(s):

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • evidence-based policy
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Epistemic injustice
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Systematic review
  • Evidential Pluralism
  • EBP+
  • EBM+

Fingerprint

Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.