Abstract
All clinical definitions of asthma recognise a characteristic set of symptoms that are periodic and vary in severity. However, symptoms (especially “wheeze”) can mean different things to patients, parents and doctors [1, 2], and there is widespread agreement that objective tests must be used. The other key part of the definition is variable airflow obstruction, and so tests that demonstrate exaggerated variability, such as repeated measurements, or pharmacological stimulation of broncho-constriction or dilation, have traditionally formed the core of asthma diagnostics. Many factors restrict widespread adoption of these tests (such as reliability, patient acceptability, and availability), and so alternatives are needed, either through development of cheaper or more user-friendly physiological tests, or detection of commonly associated traits such as atopy or type II inflammation. Many clinicians encounter difficulties in accessing these tests and so still rely on “clinical judgment”, despite evidence of misdiagnosis in around a third of cases [3, 4].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2200716 |
| Journal | European Respiratory Journal |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Sept 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '2022 ERS guidelines for asthma diagnosis in adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver