A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: Signs of change?

M. G. Gnanalingham, S. G. Robinson, D. P. Hawley, K. K. Gnanalingham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Methods: The quality of clinical studies published in five different specialties, over three decades was evaluated. Computerised search of the Medline database was undertaken to evaluate the articles published in 25 clinical journals in 1983, 1993, and 2003 from five different specialties (medicine, surgery, paediatrics, anaesthesia, and psychiatry). The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and other clinical trials (non-RCT) were noted. Results: From the 27 030 articles evaluated, there were 2283 (8.4%) RCTs, 166 (0.6%) meta-analyses, and 4153 (15.4%) other clinical trials. For the proportion of RCTs, the rank order of the specialties was; anaesthesia (503; 18%), psychiatry (294; 9.6%), medicine (899; 8.1%), paediatrics (326; 6.4%), and surgery (261; 5.3%) (p
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)397-399
    Number of pages2
    JournalPostgraduate medical journal
    Volume82
    Issue number968
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: Signs of change?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this