A brief psychometric and clinimetric evaluation of self-report burden and mental health measures completed by care partners of people with Parkinson’s-related dementia.

Sabina Vatter (Lead), Kathryn Mcdonald, Emma Stanmore, Sheree Mccormick, Linda Clare, Iracema Leroi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This report describes the evaluation of the psychometric and clinimetric properties of nine self-report measures completed by informal care partners of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) or dementia in Parkinson’s disease (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). One hundred thirty-six care partners completed measures on relationship satisfaction, burden, stress, mood, resilience, health, quality of life and feelings related to care provision. Psychometric properties, such as internal consistency, convergent validity, floor and ceiling effects, completion rate and data missingness, as well as clinimetric properties, such as time to administer, ease of scoring, readability and availability of the scales, were examined. Additionally, the design of the measure development studies was assessed with the 2018 COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Participants were mostly married women (> 85%) with a mean age of 69.4 years. The methodological quality of the design of all measure development studies was ‘inadequate’. Five widely applied measures (Zarit Burden Interview, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short Form 12 Health Survey, Relatives’ Stress Scale and EuroQoL-5D) and two less researched instruments (Brief Resilience Scale, Relationship Satisfaction Scale) had high internal consistency and completion rates, moderate to strong convergent validity, low missingness and floor effects, and excellent clinical utility ratings. Two scales (Dyadic Relationship Scale, Family Caregiving Role) received poor psychometric ratings and their usage amongst informal care partners is not recommended. In conclusion, well-validated and widely used measures received strong psychometric and clinimetric ratings. Future studies are required to determine the most reliable, valid and robust caregiver-reported measures.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • psychometrics
  • clinimetrics
  • dementia caregiving
  • measurement
  • reliability

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A brief psychometric and clinimetric evaluation of self-report burden and mental health measures completed by care partners of people with Parkinson’s-related dementia.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this