A comparison of two types of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Michael Callaghan, Jacqueline Oldham, Julie Winstanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To compare a commercially available electrical muscle stimulation regime with a new form of stimulation for the rehabilitation of the quadriceps in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Setting A research facility within a teaching hospital. Methods Sixteen patients (four men, 12 women) with patellofemoral pain, demonstrable quadriceps atrophy, but normal gait parameters were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. One group received a sequential mixed frequency stimulation pattern from a standard device. The other group received a new form of stimulation from an experimental stimulation device that contained simultaneous mixed frequency components. Outcome measures Isometric and isokinetic extension torque, muscle fatigue rate, pain, functional questionnaire, step test, knee flexion, and quadriceps cross-sectional area. Results These showed significant improvements for both groups after treatment (p< 0.05) in all outcome measures except flexion and fatigue rates, but no significant differences between the two stimulation regimes (p> 0.05). Conclusion Both stimulators performed similarly on patients with patellofemoral pain giving significant improvements for all patients for muscle strength, pain, self-reporting function and step testing. There were no significant differences between the two types of stimulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)637-646
JournalClinical Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of two types of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this