TY - JOUR
T1 - A coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing in five European cities: a mixed-methods study of process evaluation components
AU - Franse, Carmen
AU - Zhang, Xuxi
AU - Grieken, Amy Van
AU - Rietjens, Judith
AU - Alhambra-Borras, Tamara
AU - Dura, Estrella
AU - Garces-Ferrer, Jorge
AU - Van Staveren, Rob
AU - Rentoumis, Tasos
AU - Markaki, Athina
AU - Bilajac, Lovorka
AU - Vasiljev Marchesi, Vanja
AU - Rukavina, Tomislav
AU - Verma, Arpana
AU - Williams, Gregory
AU - Clough, Gary
AU - Koppelaar, Elin
AU - Martijn, Rens
AU - Mattace Raso, Francesco
AU - Voorham, Antonius J.J.
AU - Raat, Hein
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Aims
To evaluate specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe approach; a coordinated preventive care approach aimed at healthy ageing by decreasing falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty among older persons in community settings of five cities in the United Kingdom, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands and Spain.
Design
Mixed‐methods evaluation of specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe approach: reach of the target population, dose of the intervention actually delivered and received by participants and satisfaction and experience of main stakeholders involved in the approach.
Methods
The Urban Health Centres Europe approach intervention consisted of a preventive assessment, shared‐decision making on a care plan and enrolment in one or more of four coordinated care‐pathways that targeted falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty. Quantitative data from a questionnaire and quantitative/qualitative data from logbooks were collected among older persons involved in the approach. Qualitative data from focus‐groups were collected among older persons, informal caregivers and professionals involved in the approach. Quantitative data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression models. Qualitative data were analysed through thematic analysis.
Results
Having limited function was associated with non‐enrolment in falls and loneliness care‐pathways (both P<0.01). The mean rating of the approach was 8.3/10 (SD 1.9). Feeling supported by a care professional and meeting people were main benefits for older persons. Mistrust towards unfamiliar care providers, lack of confidence to engage in care activities and health constraints were main barriers towards engagement in care.
Conclusions
Although the Urban Health Centres Europe approach was received generally positively, health constraints and psychosocial barriers prevented older person's engagement in care.
Impact
coordinated preventive care approaches for older community‐dwelling persons should address health constraints and psychosocial barriers that hinder older person's engagement in care.
AB - Aims
To evaluate specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe approach; a coordinated preventive care approach aimed at healthy ageing by decreasing falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty among older persons in community settings of five cities in the United Kingdom, Greece, Croatia, the Netherlands and Spain.
Design
Mixed‐methods evaluation of specific process components of the Urban Health Centres Europe approach: reach of the target population, dose of the intervention actually delivered and received by participants and satisfaction and experience of main stakeholders involved in the approach.
Methods
The Urban Health Centres Europe approach intervention consisted of a preventive assessment, shared‐decision making on a care plan and enrolment in one or more of four coordinated care‐pathways that targeted falls, polypharmacy, loneliness and frailty. Quantitative data from a questionnaire and quantitative/qualitative data from logbooks were collected among older persons involved in the approach. Qualitative data from focus‐groups were collected among older persons, informal caregivers and professionals involved in the approach. Quantitative data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression models. Qualitative data were analysed through thematic analysis.
Results
Having limited function was associated with non‐enrolment in falls and loneliness care‐pathways (both P<0.01). The mean rating of the approach was 8.3/10 (SD 1.9). Feeling supported by a care professional and meeting people were main benefits for older persons. Mistrust towards unfamiliar care providers, lack of confidence to engage in care activities and health constraints were main barriers towards engagement in care.
Conclusions
Although the Urban Health Centres Europe approach was received generally positively, health constraints and psychosocial barriers prevented older person's engagement in care.
Impact
coordinated preventive care approaches for older community‐dwelling persons should address health constraints and psychosocial barriers that hinder older person's engagement in care.
U2 - 10.1111/jan.14181
DO - 10.1111/jan.14181
M3 - Article
SN - 0309-2402
JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing
JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing
ER -