‘A double-edged sword. This is powerful but it could be used destructively’: Perspectives of early career education researchers on learning analytics

Jenna Mittelmeier, Rebecca L. Edwards, Sarah K. Davis, Quan Nguyen, Victoria L. Murphy, Leonie Brummer, Bart Rienties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Learning analytics has been increasingly outlined as a powerful tool for measuring, analysing, and predicting learning experiences and behaviours. The rising use of learning analytics means that many educational researchers now require new ranges of technical analytical skills to contribute to an increasingly data-heavy field. However, it has been argued that educational data scientists are a ‘scarce breed’ (Buckingham Shum et al., 2013) and that more resources are needed to support the next generation of early career researchers in the education field. At the same time, little is known about how early career education researchers feel towards learning analytics and whether it is important to their current and future research practices. Using a thematic analysis of a participatory learning analytics workshop discussions with 25 early career education researchers, we outline in this article their ambitions, challenges and anxieties towards learning analytics. In doing so, we have provided a roadmap for how the learning analytics field might evolve and practical implications for supporting early career researchers’ development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-38
Number of pages19
JournalFrontline Learning Research
Volume6
Issue number2
Early online date17 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Early career researchers
  • Educational research
  • Learning analytics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘A double-edged sword. This is powerful but it could be used destructively’: Perspectives of early career education researchers on learning analytics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this