A King of Two Seas? Mamluk Maritime Trade Policy in the Wake of the Crisis of the 14th Century

Research output: Book/ReportBookpeer-review


The onslaught of the plague, possibly exacerbated by climate change, caused a crisis in 14th century Egyptian agriculture. Shifts in ownership from the state to private hands or pious foundations put further stress on the state’s traditional fiscal base. Christ argues that the sultans increased taxation and state intervention in response, and thus that control of the international transit trade turned out to be particularly profitable. In order to tap it more effectively, the Mamluk sultanate reinforced ties with the Venetians in the Mediterranean and the Rasulids in the Red Sea. Relations were grounded in an ambiguous language of gift exchange which allowed for the harmonization of nominal hierarchical difference and de facto bilateral, symbiotic exchange. On the basis of shared trade interests, the Mamluks delegated power over the ‘Two Seas’. This delegation was not perfect though; the Mamluks also sought to establish a direct if only seasonal fiscal presence in the Egyptian gateways of this trade in Alexandria, Upper Egypt and the Hijaz , thus combining delegation on the seas with tighter control in the ports in order to channel the lucrative transit trade through their Cairo power base.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherEB-Verlag Dr. Brandt
ISBN (Print)9783868932232
Publication statusPublished - 24 Nov 2017

Publication series

NameUlrich Haarmann Memorial Lecture


  • Mamluks
  • Mamluk Empire
  • Venice
  • Trade
  • Diplomacy
  • Navy

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global inequalities
  • Policy@Manchester


Dive into the research topics of 'A King of Two Seas? Mamluk Maritime Trade Policy in the Wake of the Crisis of the 14th Century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this