A minimalist explanation of truth’s asymmetry

Julian Dodd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)


Suppose that Eleanor is drowsy. Truth’s asymmetry is illustrated by the following fact: while we accept that <Eleanor is drowsy> is true because Eleanor is drowsy, we do not accept that Eleanor is drowsy because <Eleanor is drowsy> is true. This asymmetry requires an explanation, but it has been alleged, notably by David Liggins, that the minimalist about truth cannot provide one. This paper counteracts this pessimism by arguing that the minimalist can successfully explain the asymmetry conceptually, rather than metaphysically. It then goes on to defend this account against objections, in the end concluding that explaining truth’s asymmetry is no problem for the minimalist.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Philosophical Quarterly
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'A minimalist explanation of truth’s asymmetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this