A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education

Alex Squires, Dan Rigby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present a mixed methods comparative assessment of three online discussion tools widely used in higher education. We combine different data types (quantitative, qualitative) and sources (usage data, survey responses) to assess Piazza, Padlet, and Blackboard discussion boards. We highlight and discuss the differences between, and relative merits of, the tools and report the preferences of students on a large introductory Economics unit for them. We summarise lessons learnt from using the tools and make recommendations to engender greater student engagement with online discussion spaces.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100298
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Review of Economics Education
Volume47
Early online date14 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Asynchronous Message Boards
  • Student Preferences
  • Principles of Economics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this