TY - GEN
T1 - A neural-network-based investigation of eye-related movements for accurate drowsiness estimation
AU - Sun, Mingfei
AU - Tsujikawa, Masanori
AU - Onishi, Yoshifumi
AU - Ma, Xiaojuan
AU - Nishino, Atsushi
AU - Hashimoto, Satoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/10/26
Y1 - 2018/10/26
N2 - Many studies reported that eye-related movements, e.g., blank stares, blinking and drooping eyelids, are highly indicative symptoms of drowsiness. However, few researchers have investigated the computational efficacy accounted for drowsiness estimation by these eye-related movements. This paper thus analyzes two typical eye-related movements, i.e., eyelid movements Xel(t) and eyeball movements Xeb(t), and investigates neural-network-based approaches to model temporal correlations. Specifically, we compare the effectiveness of three combinations of eye-related movements, i.e., [Xel(t)], [Xeb(t)], and [Xel(t),Xeb(t)], for drowsiness estimation. Furthermore, we investigate the usefulness of two typical types of neural networks, i.e., CNN-Net and CNNLSTM-Net, for better drowsiness modeling. The experimental results show that [Xel(t),Xeb(t)] can achieve a better performance than [Xel(t)] for short time drowsiness estimation while [Xeb(t)]alone performs worse even than the baseline method (PERCLOS). In addition, we found that CNN-Net are more effective for accurate drowsiness level modeling than CNNLSTM-Net.
AB - Many studies reported that eye-related movements, e.g., blank stares, blinking and drooping eyelids, are highly indicative symptoms of drowsiness. However, few researchers have investigated the computational efficacy accounted for drowsiness estimation by these eye-related movements. This paper thus analyzes two typical eye-related movements, i.e., eyelid movements Xel(t) and eyeball movements Xeb(t), and investigates neural-network-based approaches to model temporal correlations. Specifically, we compare the effectiveness of three combinations of eye-related movements, i.e., [Xel(t)], [Xeb(t)], and [Xel(t),Xeb(t)], for drowsiness estimation. Furthermore, we investigate the usefulness of two typical types of neural networks, i.e., CNN-Net and CNNLSTM-Net, for better drowsiness modeling. The experimental results show that [Xel(t),Xeb(t)] can achieve a better performance than [Xel(t)] for short time drowsiness estimation while [Xeb(t)]alone performs worse even than the baseline method (PERCLOS). In addition, we found that CNN-Net are more effective for accurate drowsiness level modeling than CNNLSTM-Net.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85056587881
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513491
DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513491
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 30441512
AN - SCOPUS:85056587881
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
SP - 5207
EP - 5210
BT - 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2018
PB - IEEE
T2 - 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2018
Y2 - 18 July 2018 through 21 July 2018
ER -