A note concerning the comparability of the standard and automated versions of the Vocational Preference Inventory

G. P. HODGKINSON

doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x

A note concerning the comparability of the standard and automated versions of the Vocational Preference Inventory

G. P. HODGKINSON^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

IMP Business Economics

Solihull College of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the feasibility of administering the Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) by computer. Ninety‐nine subjects completed the standard and automated versions of the VPI on an alternate‐forms test‐retest basis. The two forms were found to be comparable. Consequently, it is recommended that the use of the computerized version of this test be continued. (C) 1986 The British Psychological Society

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	337-339
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Occupational Psychology
Volume	59
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x
Publication status	Published - 1986

Access to Document

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x

Cite this

@article{75865e7cf7fb48c7862aebad47da911e,

title = "A note concerning the comparability of the standard and automated versions of the Vocational Preference Inventory",

abstract = "This study investigated the feasibility of administering the Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) by computer. Ninety‐nine subjects completed the standard and automated versions of the VPI on an alternate‐forms test‐retest basis. The two forms were found to be comparable. Consequently, it is recommended that the use of the computerized version of this test be continued. (C) 1986 The British Psychological Society",

author = "HODGKINSON, {G. P.}",

year = "1986",

doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x",

language = "English",

volume = "59",

pages = "337--339",

journal = "Journal of Occupational Psychology",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note concerning the comparability of the standard and automated versions of the Vocational Preference Inventory

AU - HODGKINSON, G. P.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - This study investigated the feasibility of administering the Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) by computer. Ninety‐nine subjects completed the standard and automated versions of the VPI on an alternate‐forms test‐retest basis. The two forms were found to be comparable. Consequently, it is recommended that the use of the computerized version of this test be continued. (C) 1986 The British Psychological Society

AB - This study investigated the feasibility of administering the Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI) by computer. Ninety‐nine subjects completed the standard and automated versions of the VPI on an alternate‐forms test‐retest basis. The two forms were found to be comparable. Consequently, it is recommended that the use of the computerized version of this test be continued. (C) 1986 The British Psychological Society

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986715235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00234.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986715235

VL - 59

SP - 337

EP - 339

JO - Journal of Occupational Psychology

JF - Journal of Occupational Psychology

ER -

A note concerning the comparability of the standard and automated versions of the Vocational Preference Inventory

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this