A postmarketing study of flunarizine in migraine and vertigo

G H de Bock, J Eelhart, Harm Van Marwijk, T P Tromp, M P Springer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This prospective, open multi-centre study on flunarizine focused on the risk/benefit ratio of the use of flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine and in the treatment of vertigo, due to disorder of the vestibular system. The assessment of risks focused on the incidence of new events of depression and/or extrapyramidal syndrome during flunarizine treatment. For migraine, flunarizine was compared to propranolol in 686 patients; for vertigo, flunarizine was compared to betahistine in 198 patients. The incidence of depression during follow-up in this study was significantly higher in the flunarizine group than in the propranolol group in the condition of migraine. There were no observations of an extrapyramidal syndrome. There was a suggestion that flunarizine has more benefits than propranolol in the condition of migraine, and that betahistine has more benefit than flunarizine in the condition of vertigo. Differences in dosages could possible explain these differences
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)269-274
    Number of pages6
    JournalPharm.World Sci.
    Volume19
    Issue number0928-1231 (Print)
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 1997

    Keywords

    • Adult
    • Data Collection
    • Depression
    • Depressive Disorder
    • Female
    • Flunarizine
    • Follow-Up Studies
    • Humans
    • Incidence
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Migraine
    • Migraine Disorders
    • Multicenter Studies
    • Netherlands
    • Observation
    • Patients
    • Product Surveillance
    • Postmarketing
    • Prospective Studies
    • Risk
    • Vasodilator Agents
    • Vertigo
    • adverse effects
    • complications
    • drug therapy
    • psychology
    • therapeutic use

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A postmarketing study of flunarizine in migraine and vertigo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this