Abstract
Since the 1970s, the British electoral system has come under pressure from four factors: the decline of the cube law; the increase in minor-party seats; the decreased cohesiveness of legislative majorities; and the rise in pro-Labour bias. The first and last factors have been widely discussed though not always well understood; the second and third factors have been largely overlooked. New methods are presented for assessing the impact of these developments on past and future elections. First-past-the-post is shown to have been weakened, but not fatally. Ultimately, the biggest challenge to first-past-the-post is not intellectual but practical: whatever the theoretical arguments, these four developments may mean that electoral reform is more likely in practice. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 431-453 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Electoral Studies |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2004 |
Keywords
- British general elections
- Cube law
- Electoral reform
- Electoral systems
- Partisan bias
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A quadruple whammy for first-past-the-post'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver