TY - JOUR
T1 - A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource
AU - Coles, Daniel
AU - Angeloudis, Athanasios
AU - Greaves, Deborah
AU - Hastie, Gordon
AU - Lewis, Matthew
AU - MacKie, Lucas
AU - McNaughton, James
AU - Miles, Jon
AU - Neill, Simon
AU - Piggott, Matthew
AU - Risch, Denise
AU - Scott, Beth
AU - Sparling, Carol
AU - Stallard, Tim
AU - Thies, Philipp
AU - Walker, Stuart
AU - White, David
AU - Willden, Richard
AU - Williamson, Benjamin
N1 - Funding Information:
Tidal stream turbines harness the power of the tides, typically using horizontal axis rotors to drive a generator. Since 2008, 18 MW of tidal stream capacity has been installed in the UK. Of this, 10.4 MW is operational, with the remaining 7.7 MW now decommissioned, having completed testing []. The growth in UK tidal stream cumulative installed capacity is shown in , alongside progress globally, and that of UK fixed-bed offshore wind []. The emergence of operational tidal stream projects has been dependent on access to government subsidy. Between 2008 and 2015, tidal stream was supported by the Renewable Obligations Certificate (ROC) scheme. Electricity suppliers purchase ROCs from renewable power generators to fulfil their obligation to provide renewable electricity, while providing the generator with an income per unit of energy supplied []. The contracts for difference (CfD) scheme was introduced in 2015 to replace ROCs. The CfD scheme protects generators from volatile wholesale electricity prices by providing a flat rate for electricity production to a renewable power generator, known as the strike price, over 15 years. Developers can apply for CfD support through biennial auction rounds (ARs), where projects with the lowest strike price are selected for CfD support. The first three CfD rounds since 2015 (AR1–3) have provided subsidy support for approximately 11.2 GW of installed capacity; 10.8 GW has been won by fixed-bed offshore wind projects [–], which have a significantly lower strike price, enabled through earlier adoption along with steady subsidy support. To date, tidal stream projects, which currently have a relatively high strike price, have not been able to secure CfD support. This has slowed the rate of tidal stream deployment since 2015 significantly, as shown .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This review provides a critical, multi-faceted assessment of the practical contribution tidal stream energy can make to the UK and British Channel Islands future energy mix. Evidence is presented that broadly supports the latest national-scale practical resource estimate, of 34 TWh/year, equivalent to 11% of the UK's current annual electricity demand. The size of the practical resource depends in part on the economic competitiveness of projects. In the UK, 124 MW of prospective tidal stream capacity is currently eligible to bid for subsidy support (MeyGen 1C, 80 MW; PTEC, 30 MW; and Morlais, 14 MW). It is estimated that the installation of this 124 MW would serve to drive down the levelized cost of energy (LCoE), through learning, from its current level of around 240 £/MWh to below 150 £/MWh, based on a mid-range technology learning rate of 17%. Doing so would make tidal stream cost competitive with technologies such as combined cycle gas turbines, biomass and anaerobic digestion. Installing this 124 MW by 2031 would put tidal stream on a trajectory to install the estimated 11.5 GW needed to generate 34 TWh/year by 2050. The cyclic, predictable nature of tidal stream power shows potential to provide additional, whole-system cost benefits. These include reductions in balancing expenditure that are not considered in conventional LCoE estimates. The practical resource is also dependent on environmental constraints. To date, no collisions between animals and turbines have been detected, and only small changes in habitat have been measured. The impacts of large arrays on stratification and predator-prey interaction are projected to be an order of magnitude less than those from climate change, highlighting opportunities for risk retirement. Ongoing field measurements will be important as arrays scale up, given the uncertainty in some environmental and ecological impact models. Based on the findings presented in this review, we recommend that an updated national-scale practical resource study is undertaken that implements high-fidelity, site-specific modelling, with improved model validation from the wide range of field measurements that are now available from the major sites. Quantifying the sensitivity of the practical resource to constraints will be important to establish opportunities for constraint retirement. Quantification of whole-system benefits is necessary to fully understand the value of tidal stream in the energy system.
AB - This review provides a critical, multi-faceted assessment of the practical contribution tidal stream energy can make to the UK and British Channel Islands future energy mix. Evidence is presented that broadly supports the latest national-scale practical resource estimate, of 34 TWh/year, equivalent to 11% of the UK's current annual electricity demand. The size of the practical resource depends in part on the economic competitiveness of projects. In the UK, 124 MW of prospective tidal stream capacity is currently eligible to bid for subsidy support (MeyGen 1C, 80 MW; PTEC, 30 MW; and Morlais, 14 MW). It is estimated that the installation of this 124 MW would serve to drive down the levelized cost of energy (LCoE), through learning, from its current level of around 240 £/MWh to below 150 £/MWh, based on a mid-range technology learning rate of 17%. Doing so would make tidal stream cost competitive with technologies such as combined cycle gas turbines, biomass and anaerobic digestion. Installing this 124 MW by 2031 would put tidal stream on a trajectory to install the estimated 11.5 GW needed to generate 34 TWh/year by 2050. The cyclic, predictable nature of tidal stream power shows potential to provide additional, whole-system cost benefits. These include reductions in balancing expenditure that are not considered in conventional LCoE estimates. The practical resource is also dependent on environmental constraints. To date, no collisions between animals and turbines have been detected, and only small changes in habitat have been measured. The impacts of large arrays on stratification and predator-prey interaction are projected to be an order of magnitude less than those from climate change, highlighting opportunities for risk retirement. Ongoing field measurements will be important as arrays scale up, given the uncertainty in some environmental and ecological impact models. Based on the findings presented in this review, we recommend that an updated national-scale practical resource study is undertaken that implements high-fidelity, site-specific modelling, with improved model validation from the wide range of field measurements that are now available from the major sites. Quantifying the sensitivity of the practical resource to constraints will be important to establish opportunities for constraint retirement. Quantification of whole-system benefits is necessary to fully understand the value of tidal stream in the energy system.
KW - cost of energy
KW - environmental impact
KW - practical resource
KW - system integration
KW - tidal stream energy
KW - tidal stream power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121345292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rspa.2021.0469
DO - 10.1098/rspa.2021.0469
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85121345292
SN - 1364-5021
VL - 477
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
IS - 2255
M1 - 20210469
ER -