A service evaluation to determine where and who delivers pessary care in the UK

Lucy Dwyer, Ellie Stewart, Azita Rajai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pessaries offer effective conservative management for symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse and are frequently used in the UK. Previous publications have highlighted a lack of evidence-based pessary guidelines. There is also a dearth of evidence regarding who UK pessary practitioners are and the training received.

METHODS: A Freedom of Information request was sent to 167 healthcare organisations in the UK. Requested information included the number of pessaries inserted or changed, the grade and profession of pessary practitioners and training requirements at the organisation.

RESULTS: Responses were received from 128 organisations. One hundred and ten had provided information for practitioners managing pessaries. At 66% (72) of organisations, pessary care was provided by both doctors and nurses of varying grades. At 23% of organisations either solely doctors or solely nurses provided pessary care. At the remaining 9% there was a multidisciplinary approach to pessary care. At 3 hospitals, unregistered healthcare professionals provided pessary care. At the majority of organisations, respondents undertook supervised practise to gain skills in pessary management. Additional methods of training cited were learning through observation or achieving set competencies. Twenty-six percent received didactic training. At 21% of organisations there were no training requirements.

CONCLUSIONS: At most organisations, there was a multidisciplinary approach to pessary care. It is questionable whether unregistered healthcare professionals should be delegated responsibility for pessary care. A standardised approach to pessary practitioner training is advocated to ensure that women receive safe, evidence-based pessary care. The UK Clinical Guidance Group for the Use of Pessaries in Vaginal Prolapse is currently developing national evidence-based guidelines to support pessary practitioners in their practice, including training requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1001-1006
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume32
Issue number4
Early online date18 Sept 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Pessary
  • Pessary practitioner prolapse
  • Service evaluation
  • Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A service evaluation to determine where and who delivers pessary care in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this