A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape

Casper J. Breuker, James S. Patterson, Christian Peter Klingenberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The nature of developmental buffering processes has been debated extensively, based on both theoretical reasoning and empirical studies. In particular, controversy has focused on the question of whether distinct processes are responsible for canalization, the buffering against environmental or genetic variation, and for developmental stability, the buffering against random variation intrinsic in developmental processes. Here, we address this question for the size and shape of Drosophila melanogaster wings in an experimental design with extensively replicated and fully controlled genotypes. The amounts of variation among individuals and of fluctuating asymmetry differ markedly among genotypes, demonstrating a clear genetic basis for size and shape variability. For wing shape, there is a high correlation between the amounts of variation among individuals and fluctuating asymmetry, which indicates a correspondence between the two types of buffering. Likewise, the multivariate patterns of shape variation among individuals and of fluctuating asymmetry show a close association. For wing size, however, the amounts of individual variation and fluctuating asymmetry are not correlated. There was a significant link between the amounts of variation between wing size and shape, more so for fluctuating asymmetry than for variation among individuals. Overall, these experiments indicate a considerable degree of shared control of individual variation and fluctuating asymmetry, although it appears to differ between traits. © 2006 Breuker et al.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere7
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this