A systematic review of quality of life in adults with muscle disease

Christopher D. Graham, Michael R. Rose, Elizabeth A. Grunfeld, Simon D. Kyle, John Weinman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We reviewed the literature on how muscle disease affects quality of life compared to healthy controls, and the factors that influence the effects of muscle disease on quality of life. We also wanted to know whether quality of life differed between muscle diseases. We searched online databases and identified 26 relevant studies. The quality of each study was assessed, results sections analysed and a database of factors associated with quality of life developed. We graded the level of evidence supporting the association between each factor and quality of life as inconclusive, moderate or high. Compared to controls, muscle disease compromised quality of life in all areas of functioning. There was little evidence to suggest that quality of life differed significantly between muscle diseases. There was a high level of evidence suggesting that disease severity, pain, fatigue, and mood significantly affect quality of life. There was a moderate level of evidence suggesting that illness perceptions, coping strategies, age and gender affect quality of life. Several factors had an inconsistent level of evidence. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1581-1592
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Neurology
    Volume258
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

    Keywords

    • Muscle disease
    • Neuromuscular
    • Psychosocial
    • Quality of life

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of quality of life in adults with muscle disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this