A technique for assessing environmental impact risks of agricultural systems

Olha Sydorovych, Charles W. Raczkowski, Ada Wossink, J. Paul Mueller, Nancy G. Creamer, Shuijin Hu, Melissa Bell, Cong Tu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Conventional agriculture often aims to achieve high returns without allowing for sustainable natural resource management. To prevent environmental degradation, agricultural systems must be assessed and environmental standards need to be developed. This study used a multi-factor approach to assess the potential environmental impact risk of six diverse systems: five production systems and a successional system or abandoned agronomic field. Assessment factors were soil quality status, amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied and tillage intensity. The assessment identified the best management practices (BMP)conventional tillage system as a high-risk system mostly because of extensive tillage. The certified organic system was also extensively tilled and was characterized by P build-up in the soil, but performed well based on other assessment factors. Conversely, the BMPno tillage and the cropanimal integrated system were characterized as low risk mainly because of reduced tillage. The paper discusses assessment strengths and weaknesses, ways to improve indicators used, and the need for additional indicators. We concluded that with further development the technique will become a resourceful tool to promote agricultural sustainability and environmental stewardship and assist policy-making processes. © 2009 Cambridge University Press.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages9
JournalRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2009


  • Agricultural production systems
  • Best management practices
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Environmental risk indicators
  • Farming systems
  • Large-scale systems experiment
  • Soil quality


Dive into the research topics of 'A technique for assessing environmental impact risks of agricultural systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this