Abstract
In this paper I trace the changing characterisation of health and consider the evolution of health within a shifting paradigmatic landscape. I argue that understanding health now encompasses the importance of wellbeing as a key determinant of longer-term good health. I use the case study of body modification and body art to explore this further. I argue that while body modification and body art, as a means of self-expression and empowerment, is relatively easy to access, there are critical gaps in the regulatory framework that may undermine the notion of wellbeing and individual choice. I critique the Court of Appeal’s decision in R v BM, which raises particular public interest concerns, but conclude that it is a missed opportunity in relation to how the law understands the promotion of ‘self’ within a model of wellbeing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 22 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Laws |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- Body Art; Health; Healthism; Regulation; Wellbeing