Abatacept or tocilizumab after rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis? An exploratory study suggests non-response to rituximab is associated with persistently high IL-6 and better clinical response to IL-6 blocking therapy

Sudipto Das, Edward M Vital, Sarah Horton, Domini Bryer, Yasser El-Sherbiny, Andrew C Rawstron, Frederique Ponchel, Paul Emery, Maya H Buch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different targeted approaches-abatacept or tocilizumab-after rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, and to explain observed difference in efficacy using blood and synovial studies of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and B cells in patients receiving rituximab therapy.

METHODS: Consecutive series of patients who had discontinued rituximab therapy owing to inefficacy or toxicity were treated with abatacept (n=16) or tocilizumab (n=35). Clinical response and reasons for discontinuation were evaluated. Serial blood and synovial samples were obtained from a group of 57 and 25 rituximab-treated patients, respectively, and were analysed for B cells and IL-6 using flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR.

RESULTS: In the abatacept group, mean (SEM) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) reduced from 5.69 (0.42) at baseline to 4.94 (0.44) at 6 months (p=0.12). In the tocilizumab group: mean (SEM) DAS28- ESR reduced from 5.75 (0.21) at baseline to 3.28 (0.26) at 6 months (p<0.001). This was paralleled by a significant swollen joint count reduction in the tocilizumab (5.47 (0.70) to 2.70 (0.61), p=0.033), but not abatacept (6.23 (1.3) to 4.15 (1.2), p=0.26), group. In the synovium, despite complete depletion of B cells in 19/22 patients, IL-6 mRNA expression was not significantly reduced after rituximab. Blood B cell numbers remained low 12 months after rituximab. Serum IL-6 was raised at baseline and significantly higher in rituximab clinical non-responders (p=0.035) than responders. A significant reduction in serum IL-6 was seen in rituximab clinical responders (p=0.005) but not in non-responders (p=0.237).

CONCLUSION: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom rituximab therapy failed despite adequate B cell depletion, IL-6-directed therapy might be a more logical and effective treatment choice than T cell costimulation blockade. Further controlled studies investigating other possible mechanisms are needed to validate these initial findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)909-12
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of the rheumatic diseases
Volume73
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Abatacept
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use
  • Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood
  • Female
  • Flow Cytometry
  • Humans
  • Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Interleukin-6/analysis
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Rituximab
  • Synovial Membrane/chemistry
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abatacept or tocilizumab after rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis? An exploratory study suggests non-response to rituximab is associated with persistently high IL-6 and better clinical response to IL-6 blocking therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this