Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents

Jacqueline L. Power; Céleste M. Brotheridge; John Blenkinsopp; Lynn Bowes-Sperry; Nikos Bozionelos; Zoltán Buzády; Aichia Chuang; Dawn Drnevich; Antonio Garzon-Vico; Catherine Leighton; Sergio M. Madero; Wai ming Mak; Romina Mathew; Silvia Inés Monserrat; Bahaudin G. Mujtaba; Miguel R. Olivas-Lujan; Panagiotis Polycroniou; Christine A. Sprigg; Carolyn Axtell; David Holman; Jaime A. Ruiz-Gutiérrez; Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu Nnedumm

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents

Jacqueline L. Power, Céleste M. Brotheridge, John Blenkinsopp, Lynn Bowes-Sperry, Nikos Bozionelos, Zoltán Buzády, Aichia Chuang, Dawn Drnevich, Antonio Garzon-Vico, Catherine Leighton, Sergio M. Madero, Wai ming Mak, Romina Mathew, Silvia Inés Monserrat, Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, Miguel R. Olivas-Lujan, Panagiotis Polycroniou, Christine A. Sprigg, Carolyn Axtell, David HolmanJaime A. Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu Nnedumm

PMO Organisational Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

248 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper is the first to explore the impact of culture on the acceptability of workplace bullying and to do so across a wide range of countries. Physically intimidating bullying is less acceptable than work related bullying both within groups of similar cultures and globally. Cultures with high performance orientation find bullying to be more acceptable while those with high future orientation find bullying to be less acceptable. A high humane orientation is associated with finding work related bullying to be less acceptable. Confucian Asia finds work-related bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa country clusters and finds physically intimidating bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo and Latin America country clusters. The differences in the acceptability of bullying with respect to these cultures are partially explained in terms of cultural dimensions. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	374-380
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Business Research
Volume	66
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018
Publication status	Published - Mar 2013

Keywords

Cross-cultural differences
Future orientation
Humane orientation
Performance orientation
Workplace bullying

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

POST-PEER-REVIEW-PUBLISHERS.PDFFinal published version, 218 KB

Cite this

Power, J. L., Brotheridge, C. M., Blenkinsopp, J., Bowes-Sperry, L., Bozionelos, N., Buzády, Z., Chuang, A., Drnevich, D., Garzon-Vico, A., Leighton, C., Madero, S. M., Mak, W. M., Mathew, R., Monserrat, S. I., Mujtaba, B. G., Olivas-Lujan, M. R., Polycroniou, P., Sprigg, C. A., Axtell, C., ... Nnedumm, A. U. O. (2013). Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 374-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

@article{61e097704fc94baa9b287a75bdb0bc43,

title = "Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents",

abstract = "This paper is the first to explore the impact of culture on the acceptability of workplace bullying and to do so across a wide range of countries. Physically intimidating bullying is less acceptable than work related bullying both within groups of similar cultures and globally. Cultures with high performance orientation find bullying to be more acceptable while those with high future orientation find bullying to be less acceptable. A high humane orientation is associated with finding work related bullying to be less acceptable. Confucian Asia finds work-related bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa country clusters and finds physically intimidating bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo and Latin America country clusters. The differences in the acceptability of bullying with respect to these cultures are partially explained in terms of cultural dimensions. {\textcopyright} 2011 Elsevier Inc.",

keywords = "Cross-cultural differences, Future orientation, Humane orientation, Performance orientation, Workplace bullying",

author = "Power, {Jacqueline L.} and Brotheridge, {C{\'e}leste M.} and John Blenkinsopp and Lynn Bowes-Sperry and Nikos Bozionelos and Zolt{\'a}n Buz{\'a}dy and Aichia Chuang and Dawn Drnevich and Antonio Garzon-Vico and Catherine Leighton and Madero, {Sergio M.} and Mak, {Wai ming} and Romina Mathew and Monserrat, {Silvia In{\'e}s} and Mujtaba, {Bahaudin G.} and Olivas-Lujan, {Miguel R.} and Panagiotis Polycroniou and Sprigg, {Christine A.} and Carolyn Axtell and David Holman and Ruiz-Guti{\'e}rrez, {Jaime A.} and Nnedumm, {Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu}",

year = "2013",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "374--380",

journal = "Journal of Business Research",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "3",

}

Power, JL, Brotheridge, CM, Blenkinsopp, J, Bowes-Sperry, L, Bozionelos, N, Buzády, Z, Chuang, A, Drnevich, D, Garzon-Vico, A, Leighton, C, Madero, SM, Mak, WM, Mathew, R, Monserrat, SI, Mujtaba, BG, Olivas-Lujan, MR, Polycroniou, P, Sprigg, CA, Axtell, C, Holman, D, Ruiz-Gutiérrez, JA & Nnedumm, AUO 2013, 'Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents', Journal of Business Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 374-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents

AU - Power, Jacqueline L.

AU - Brotheridge, Céleste M.

AU - Blenkinsopp, John

AU - Bowes-Sperry, Lynn

AU - Bozionelos, Nikos

AU - Buzády, Zoltán

AU - Chuang, Aichia

AU - Drnevich, Dawn

AU - Garzon-Vico, Antonio

AU - Leighton, Catherine

AU - Madero, Sergio M.

AU - Mak, Wai ming

AU - Mathew, Romina

AU - Monserrat, Silvia Inés

AU - Mujtaba, Bahaudin G.

AU - Olivas-Lujan, Miguel R.

AU - Polycroniou, Panagiotis

AU - Sprigg, Christine A.

AU - Axtell, Carolyn

AU - Holman, David

AU - Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Jaime A.

AU - Nnedumm, Anthony Ugochukwu Obiajulu

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - This paper is the first to explore the impact of culture on the acceptability of workplace bullying and to do so across a wide range of countries. Physically intimidating bullying is less acceptable than work related bullying both within groups of similar cultures and globally. Cultures with high performance orientation find bullying to be more acceptable while those with high future orientation find bullying to be less acceptable. A high humane orientation is associated with finding work related bullying to be less acceptable. Confucian Asia finds work-related bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa country clusters and finds physically intimidating bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo and Latin America country clusters. The differences in the acceptability of bullying with respect to these cultures are partially explained in terms of cultural dimensions. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

AB - This paper is the first to explore the impact of culture on the acceptability of workplace bullying and to do so across a wide range of countries. Physically intimidating bullying is less acceptable than work related bullying both within groups of similar cultures and globally. Cultures with high performance orientation find bullying to be more acceptable while those with high future orientation find bullying to be less acceptable. A high humane orientation is associated with finding work related bullying to be less acceptable. Confucian Asia finds work-related bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo, Latin America, and Sub-Saharan Africa country clusters and finds physically intimidating bullying to be more acceptable than the Anglo and Latin America country clusters. The differences in the acceptability of bullying with respect to these cultures are partially explained in terms of cultural dimensions. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

KW - Cross-cultural differences

KW - Future orientation

KW - Humane orientation

KW - Performance orientation

KW - Workplace bullying

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 374

EP - 380

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

IS - 3

ER -

Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this