Acceptable difference: Diversity, representation and pathways to UK politics

Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson, Ryan Combs, Christina Eason, Francesca Gains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

174 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Political representation in the UK continues to be dominated by white, middle-aged, middle-class men, but several equalities groups now have an established presence in national political institutions. This article draws on research with stakeholder organisations, lobby groups for under-represented groups within political parties, former, current and unsuccessful candidates and sitting and former elected politicians conducted prior to the 2010 General Election. It finds that where aspiring candidates from under-represented groups have been selected, it was because they were 'acceptably different' conforming to aspects of the 'archetypal candidate'. We argue that increasingly dominant professionalised 'pathways' into national politics have allowed greater diversity, but remain narrow and exclusionary. Progress is less a reflection of a more open political system, instead representing accommodation of still under-represented groups to, and by, the existing system. Copyright © The Author [2012].
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-267
Number of pages21
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume66
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Keywords

  • Representation
  • Candidate selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptable difference: Diversity, representation and pathways to UK politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this