TY - JOUR
T1 - Accountability in an Independent Regulatory Setting: The Use of Impact Assessment in the Regulation of Financial Reporting in the UK
AU - Samsonova-Taddei, Anna
AU - Turley, Stuart
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The growing reliance on non-governmental independent regulators in many social and economic domains, including corporate financial reporting, has brought to the fore concerns over their regulatory accountability. This study looks at one aspect of the regulatory due process - regulatory Impact Assessment (IA). Drawing on the analytical framework developed by Bovens (2006; 2007), we evaluate the contribution of IA as an instrument for enhancing regulatory accountability in the context of the Financial Reporting Council, an independent regulator for the accountancy profession in the United Kingdom. The study’s findings suggest that, despite an increasing level of sophistication in the manner in which IA is used within FRC, the contribution of IA to regulatory accountability remains limited. Specifically, there are concerns as to whether IA is used to achieve a transparent and fair regulatory process or simply to maintain an image of good governance and justify policy decisions that would have been made even in the absence of IA.
AB - The growing reliance on non-governmental independent regulators in many social and economic domains, including corporate financial reporting, has brought to the fore concerns over their regulatory accountability. This study looks at one aspect of the regulatory due process - regulatory Impact Assessment (IA). Drawing on the analytical framework developed by Bovens (2006; 2007), we evaluate the contribution of IA as an instrument for enhancing regulatory accountability in the context of the Financial Reporting Council, an independent regulator for the accountancy profession in the United Kingdom. The study’s findings suggest that, despite an increasing level of sophistication in the manner in which IA is used within FRC, the contribution of IA to regulatory accountability remains limited. Specifically, there are concerns as to whether IA is used to achieve a transparent and fair regulatory process or simply to maintain an image of good governance and justify policy decisions that would have been made even in the absence of IA.
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-017-3527-1
DO - 10.1007/s10551-017-3527-1
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-4544
VL - 155
SP - 1053
EP - 1076
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
IS - 4
ER -