Accounting for quality: arts evaluation, public value and the case of “Culture counts”

Abigail Gilmore, Hilary Glow, Katya Johanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Arts policy has a longstanding relationship with the concept of “quality” and the ways in which organisations measure, evaluate and account for it. Culture Counts, an evaluation system and digital platform, compiles data from standardised evaluation surveys of different stakeholder groups – organisations, audiences, critics, funders and peers – and provides the means to compare and triangulate data in an accessible format. As a result, it claims to provide a more effective, democratic tool for quality measurement of art, which demonstrates the public value of AQ4 funding [Department of Culture and the Arts, & Knell, J. (2014). Public value measurement framework: Measuring the quality of the arts. Department of Culture and the Arts; Mellor, S. (2014). Understanding the value of arts and culture. ACE, blog posted July 21. Retrieved from understanding-value-arts-and-culture.]. Through qualitative research with two consortia of organisations involved in Culture Counts pilot projects in Manchester, England and Victoria, Australia, we explore these claims, comparing the reception and promotion of the system in both countries and considering its potential incorporation into policy assessment frameworks and adoption within arts organisations’ existing evaluation capacities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-294
JournalCultural Trends
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2017


  • Quality
  • Arts policy
  • evaluation
  • Public value
  • big data
  • metrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for quality: arts evaluation, public value and the case of “Culture counts”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this