Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing

Rafael Alcadipani, John Hassard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In recent years the approach to social theory known as Actor-Network Theory (ANT) has been adopted within a range of social science fields. Despite its popularity, ANT is considered a controversial approach in that it appears to promote a sociological perspective that lacks substantive political critique. This is argued to be particularly true in ANT's 'translations' in management and organization studies (MOS). In this article, we argue that the 'ANT and After' literature offers the potential to develop such a political critique. In particular we suggest it presents the opportunity to develop an approach that de-naturalizes organization(s), has the ability to deliver critical performativity, and at the same time offer a reflexive approach to management and organizational knowledge. Using organizational examples, we argue that ANT and After can offer insights relevant to the development of a critical perspective on MOS, notably through its advocacy of a 'political ontology' of organizing. © The Author(s) 2010.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-435
Number of pages16
JournalOrganization
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Actor-Network Theory
  • ANT and After
  • Critical performativity
  • Management and organization studies
  • Political ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Actor-Network Theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this