Addressing sampling errors and diversity loss in UMDA

Juergen Branke, Clemens Lode, Jonathan L. Shapiro

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Estimation of distribution algorithms replace the typical crossover and mutation operators by constructing a probabilistic model and generating offspring according to this model. In previous studies, it has been shown that this generally leads to diversity loss due to sampling errors. In this paper, for the case of the simple Univariate Marginal Distribution Algorithm (UMDA), we propose and test several methods for counteracting diversity loss. The diversity loss can come in two phases: sampling from the probability model (offspring generation) and selection. We show that it is possible to completely remove the sampling error during offspring generation. Furthermore, we examine several plausible model construction variants which counteract diversity loss during selection and demonstrate that these update rules work better than the standard update on a variety of simple test problems. Copyright 2007 ACM.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference|Proc. Gen. Evol. Comput. Conf.
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
    Pages508-515
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)1595936971, 9781595936974
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007
    Event9th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007 - London
    Duration: 1 Jul 2007 → …
    http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/gecco/gecco2007.html#BrankeLS07http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/gecco/BrankeLS07.xmlhttp://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/gecco/BrankeLS07

    Conference

    Conference9th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007
    CityLondon
    Period1/07/07 → …
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Sampling error
    • UMDA
    • Variance loss

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing sampling errors and diversity loss in UMDA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this