Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Men With Adverse Pathologic Features–The Debate Continues

Ronald C. Chen, Ananya Choudhury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For men with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy and are found to have adverse pathologic features (positive margin, extraprostatic extension [pT3a], and/or seminal vesicle invasion [pT3b]), there has been a long debate regarding the benefits versus harms of 2 competing management approaches: immediate adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) and early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT). Recently, the highly anticipated results from the RADICALS-RT, 1 RAVES, 2 and GETUG-AFU-17 3 randomized trials and the ARTISTIC meta-analysis, 4 using data from the 3 trials, were published. In this article, the authors review the data from these recent publications and discuss whether these studies help settle the debate regarding ART versus eSRT.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)839-843
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation: Oncology - Biology - Physics
Volume109
Issue number4
Early online date15 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2021

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Men With Adverse Pathologic Features–The Debate Continues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this