Abstract
For men with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy and are found to have adverse pathologic features (positive margin, extraprostatic extension [pT3a], and/or seminal vesicle invasion [pT3b]), there has been a long debate regarding the benefits versus harms of 2 competing management approaches: immediate adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) and early salvage radiation therapy (eSRT). Recently, the highly anticipated results from the RADICALS-RT, 1 RAVES, 2 and GETUG-AFU-17 3 randomized trials and the ARTISTIC meta-analysis, 4 using data from the 3 trials, were published. In this article, the authors review the data from these recent publications and discuss whether these studies help settle the debate regarding ART versus eSRT.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 839-843 |
Journal | International Journal of Radiation: Oncology - Biology - Physics |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 15 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Mar 2021 |
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre