Agency and intentionality-dependent experiences of moral emotions

Amy Bland, T. Schei, J.p. Roiser, M.a. Mehta, R. Zahn, A. Seara-cardoso, E. Viding, B.j. Sahakian, T.w. Robbins, R. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)


Moral emotions are thought to influence moral behaviour by providing a driving force to do good and to avoid doing bad. In this study we examined moral emotions; specifically, guilt, shame, annoyance and feeling “bad” from two different perspectives in a moral scenario; the agent and the victim whilst manipulating the intentionality of the harm; intentional and unintentional. Two hundred participants completed a moral emotions task, which utilised cartoons to depict everyday moral scenarios. As expected, we found that self-blaming emotions such as shame and guilt were much more frequent when taking on the perspective of the agent whilst annoyance was more frequent from the victim perspective. Feeling bad, however, was not agency-specific. Notably, when the harm was intentional, we observed significantly greater shame ratings from the perspective of the agent compared to when the harm was unintentional. In addition, we also found clear gender differences and further observed correlations between moral emotions and personality variables such as psychoticism and neuroticism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110125
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Early online date23 May 2020
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Agency and intentionality-dependent experiences of moral emotions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this