Agency, duties and the "Ashley treatment"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In 2006, a paper in the journal Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine described a novel case of growth attenuation therapy and other treatments carried out on Ashley, a severely cognitively, neurologically and physically disabled 6-year-old girl. Some of the moral arguments that have sprung up in respect of the so-called "Ashley treatment" are considered, and it is suggested that they all miss something-that the proper treatment of Ashley may have as much to do with doctors' duties to themselves as with their duties to her. It is suggested that the Ashley treatment may have been in violation of doctors' self-regarding duties and that this possibility is worthy of further investigation. Copyright © 2009 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)658-661
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Agency, duties and the "Ashley treatment"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this