Agency in architecture: Rethinking criticality in theory and practice

Isabelle Doucet, Kenny Cupers

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review


Whether critiquing the architect's societal position and the role of the user, conceptualising the performative dimension of the architectural object, or considering the effects of theory for architecture at large, current debates in architecture intersect in the notion of agency. As fundamental as it is often taken for granted, this notion forms the keystone of this issue, inviting contributors to rethink architecture's specificity, its performance, and its social and political relevance. Agency in architecture inevitably entails questioning the relation between theory and practice, and what it might mean to be critical - both inside and outside architecture - today. The main proposal is to rethink contemporary criticality in architecture, by explicating the notion of agency in three major directions: first, 'the agency of what?' or the question of multiplicity and relationality; second, 'how does it work?', a question referring to location, mode and vehicle; and third, 'to what effect?', bringing up the notion of intentionality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages5
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Agency in architecture: Rethinking criticality in theory and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this