Aggressive vs nonaggressive therapy for metastatic NSCLC

Nicholas Thatcher, Robert M. Niven, Heather Anderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Clinicians tend to underestimate potential modest benefits of chemotherapy. They are often reluctant to refer patients for chemotherapy, perhaps because they expect the side effects to outweigh any perceived benefits. However, patients are much more ready to accept chemotherapy, even when the likely benefits are small. Quality of life, change in performance status, and relief of tumor-related symptoms are important additional parameters of treatment assessment. Taking account of these other factors will help clinicians balance quality and quantity of life in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalChest
    Volume109
    Issue number5
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Keywords

    • drug therapy: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
    • Clinical Trials as Topic
    • Health Status
    • Humans
    • drug therapy: Lung Neoplasms
    • Quality of Life
    • Survival Rate
    • Treatment Outcome

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aggressive vs nonaggressive therapy for metastatic NSCLC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this