Altered emotionality, spatial memory and cholinergic function in caveolin-1 knock-out mice

Laura Gioiosa, Carla Raggi, Laura Ricceri, Jean François Jasmin, Philippe G. Frank, Franco Capozza, Michael P. Lisanti, Enrico Alleva, Massimo Sargiacomo, Giovanni Laviola

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Neurological phenotypes associated with loss of caveolin 1 (cav-1) (the defining structural protein in caveolar vesicles, which regulate signal transduction and cholesterol trafficking in cells) in mice have been reported recently. In brain, cav-1 is highly expressed in neurons and glia. We investigated emotional and cognitive behavioural domains in mice deficient in cav-1 (CavKO mice). CavKO mice were more anxious and spent more time in self-directed grooming behaviour than wild-type (wt) mice. In a spatial/working memory task, CavKO mice failed to recognize the object displacement, thus showing a spatial memory impairment. CavKO mice showed higher locomotor activity than wt mice, thus suggesting reduced inhibitory function by CNS cholinergic systems. Behavioural response to the cholinergic muscarinic antagonist, scopolamine (2 mg/Kg), was decreased in CavKO mice. Few behavioural sex differences emerged in mice; whereas the sex differences were generally attenuated or even reverted in the null genotype. Our data confirm a distinct behavioural phenotype in CavKO mice and indicate a selective alteration in central cholinergic function. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)255-262
    Number of pages7
    JournalBehavioural brain research
    Volume188
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 2008

    Keywords

    • Caveolin
    • Cholinergic system
    • Cognitive behaviour
    • Knock-out mouse model
    • Scopolamine
    • Sex differences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Altered emotionality, spatial memory and cholinergic function in caveolin-1 knock-out mice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this