Alternative splicing of a Drosophila GABA receptor subunit gene identifies determinants of agonist potency

A. M. Hosie, S. D. Buckingham, J. K. Presnail, D. B. Sattelle

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Alternative splicing of the Drosophila melanogaster Rdl gene yields four ionotropic GABA receptor subunits. The two Rdl splice variants cloned to date, RDLac and RDLbd (DRC17-1-2), differ in their apparent agonist affinity. Here, we report the cloning of a third splice variant of Rdl, RDLad. Two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology was used to investigate agonist pharmacology of this expressed subunit following cRNA injection into Xenopus laevis oocytes. The ECso values for GABA and its analogues isoguvacine, muscimol, isonipecotic acid and 3-amino sulphonic acid on the RDLad homomeric receptor differed from those previously described for RDLac and DRC17-1-2 receptors. In addition to providing a possible physiological role for the alternative splicing of Rdl, these data delineate a hitherto functionally unassigned region of the N-terminal domain of GABA receptor subunits, which affects agonist potency and aligns closely with known determinants of potency in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Thus, using expression in Xenopus oocytes, we have demonstrated differences in agonist potency for the neurotransmitter GABA (and four analogues) between splice variant products of the Drosophila melanogaster Rdl gene encoding homomer-forming GABA receptor subunits. © 2001 IBRO.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)709-714
    Number of pages5
    JournalNeuroscience
    Volume102
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2001

    Keywords

    • Agonist binding site
    • Gene splicing
    • Ligand-gated ion channel D. melanogaster
    • Rdl gene

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative splicing of a Drosophila GABA receptor subunit gene identifies determinants of agonist potency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this