An electrochemical study of antineoplastic gallium, iron and ruthenium complexes with redox noninnocent α-N-heterocyclic chalcogensemicarbazones

Christian R. Kowol, Erwin Reisner, Ion Chiorescu, Vladimir B. Arion, Markus Galanski, Dirk V. Deubel, Bernhard K. Keppler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The electrochemical properties of a series of α-N-heterocyclic chalcogensemicarbazones (HL), namely, thiosemicarbazones, selenosemicarbazones, and semicarbazones, and their gallium(III), iron(III), and ruthenium(III) complexes with the general formula [ML2][Y] (M = Ga, Fe or Ru; Y = PF6-, NO3-, or FeCl4 -) were studied by cyclic voltammetry. The novel compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, a number of spectroscopic methods (NMR, UV-vis, IR), mass spectrometry and by X-ray crystallography. All complexes show several, mostly reversible, redox waves attributable to the reduction of the noninnocent chalcogensemicarbazone ligands at lower potentials (0 V vs NHE) in organic electrolyte solutions. The cyclic voltammograms of the gallium complexes display at least two consecutive reversible one-electron reduction waves. These reductions are shifted by ∼0.6 V to lower potentials in the corresponding iron and ruthenium complexes. The electrochemical, chemical, and spectroscopic data indicate that the ligand-centered reduction takes place at the CH 3C=N double bond. Quantum chemical calculations on the geometric and electronic structures of 2-acetylpyridine 4N,4N, dimethylthiosemicarbazone (HLB), the corresponding metal complexes [Ga(LB)2]+ and [FeII(L B)2], and the one-electron reduction product for each of these species support the assignment of the reduction site and elucidate the observed order of the ligand-centered redox potentials, E1/2([Fe II(L)2]) <E1/2(HL) <E 1/2([Ga(L)2]+). The influence of water on the redox potentials of the complexes is reported and the physiological relevance of the electrochemical data for cytotoxicity as well as for ribonucleotide reductase inhibitory capacity are discussed. © 2008 American Chemical Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11032-11047
    Number of pages15
    JournalInorganic Chemistry: including bioinorganic chemistry
    Volume47
    Issue number23
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2008

    Keywords

    • Electron density (chalcogenosemicarbazone and gallium and iron complexes and reduced species)
    • Cytotoxicity (electrochem. study of antineoplastic gallium, iron and ruthenium complexes with redox noninnocent heterocyclic chalcogensemicarbazones)
    • Crystal structure
    • Molecular structure (of acetylpyrazine phenylthiosemicarbazone and dimethyl(pyridinylethyl)hydrazinecarbothioamide and gallium acetylpyrazine phenylthiosemicarbazonato complex nitrate salt monohydrate)
    • Ionization (of amine moieties on thiosemicarbazone complexes and half-wave potential of gallium and iron complexes)
    • Cyclic voltammetry (of gallium and iron and ruthenium nitrogen heterocyclic chalcogenosemicarbazone complexes in MeCN)
    • Reduction
    • Reduction potential (of gallium and iron and ruthenium nitrogen heterocyclic chalcogenosemicarbazone complexes in MeCN or DMF)
    • LUMO (of nitrogen heterocyclic thiosemicarbazone and oxidized and reduced species and gallium complexes)
    • Half wave potential
    • Oxidation potential (of ruthenium nitrogen heterocyclic chalcogenosemicarbazone complexes in MeCN or DMF)
    • electrochem antineoplastic gallium iron ruthenium noninnocent nitrogen heterocyclic chalcogensemicarbazone

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An electrochemical study of antineoplastic gallium, iron and ruthenium complexes with redox noninnocent α-N-heterocyclic chalcogensemicarbazones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this