TY - JOUR
T1 - An initial experience with rapid microwave processing in the one-stop breast clinic
AU - Parkin, Edward
AU - Hindocha, Sandip
AU - Subar, Daren
AU - Mehrban, Imran
AU - Walls, Janet
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Background Rapid microwave processing allows core biopsy results to be obtained within a 3- to 4-h time period. This study was designed to compare the accuracy and reporting time of microwave-processed breast biopsies with samples processed using traditional methods. Methods Concordance of the preoperative biopsy report with postoperative histology for tumor type, grade, and detection of lymphovascular invasion was recorded for both techniques. Also reviewed were the time taken between day of biopsy and day of reporting, waiting time between biopsy and surgery, and number of preoperative outpatient appointments. Results In the microwave-processed group (MG; n = 43), there was a 92% concordance rate between preoperative biopsy and postoperative histology for tumor type. In the traditional group (TG; n = 43), it was 80% (P>0.05). For tumor grade, there was a concordance rate of 64% in MG and 93% in TG (P>0.05). For detection of lymphovascular invasion, there was agreement in 88% of cases in MG and 67% in TG (P>0.05). Twenty-five patients from MG were informed of their diagnosis on the day of biopsy. There was no difference in waiting time from biopsy to surgery or number of preoperative outpatient appointments between MG and TG (P>0.05). Conclusions Microwave processing allows safe and accurate immediate histological reporting. As a result, surgical management can be planned at the initial outpatient consultation. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010.
AB - Background Rapid microwave processing allows core biopsy results to be obtained within a 3- to 4-h time period. This study was designed to compare the accuracy and reporting time of microwave-processed breast biopsies with samples processed using traditional methods. Methods Concordance of the preoperative biopsy report with postoperative histology for tumor type, grade, and detection of lymphovascular invasion was recorded for both techniques. Also reviewed were the time taken between day of biopsy and day of reporting, waiting time between biopsy and surgery, and number of preoperative outpatient appointments. Results In the microwave-processed group (MG; n = 43), there was a 92% concordance rate between preoperative biopsy and postoperative histology for tumor type. In the traditional group (TG; n = 43), it was 80% (P>0.05). For tumor grade, there was a concordance rate of 64% in MG and 93% in TG (P>0.05). For detection of lymphovascular invasion, there was agreement in 88% of cases in MG and 67% in TG (P>0.05). Twenty-five patients from MG were informed of their diagnosis on the day of biopsy. There was no difference in waiting time from biopsy to surgery or number of preoperative outpatient appointments between MG and TG (P>0.05). Conclusions Microwave processing allows safe and accurate immediate histological reporting. As a result, surgical management can be planned at the initial outpatient consultation. © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2010.
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-010-0747-2
DO - 10.1007/s00268-010-0747-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 20703464
SN - 1432-2323
VL - 34
SP - 3036
EP - 3041
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 12
ER -