TY - JOUR
T1 - An international core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia (COS‐PPA): Consensus‐based recommendations for communication interventions across research and clinical settings
AU - Volkmer, Anna
AU - Alves, Emily Viega
AU - Bar‐Zeev, Hagit
AU - Barbieri, Elena
AU - Battista, Petronilla
AU - Beales, Ashleigh
AU - Beber, Barbara Costa
AU - Brotherhood, Emilie
AU - Cadorio, Ines Ribeiro
AU - Carthery‐Goulart, Maria Teresa
AU - Cartwright, Jade
AU - Crutch, Sebastian
AU - Croot, Karen
AU - Freitas, Maria Isabel d´Ávila
AU - Gallée, Jeanne
AU - Grasso, Stephanie M.
AU - Haley, Katarina
AU - Hendriksen, Heleen
AU - Henderson, Shalom
AU - Jiskoot, Lize
AU - Almeida, Isabel Junqueira
AU - Kindell, Jackie
AU - Kingma, Rachel
AU - Kwan‐Chen, Lorinda LY
AU - Lavoie, Monica
AU - Lifshitz‐Ben‐Basat, Adi
AU - Jokel, Regina
AU - Mahut‐Dubos, Aurore
AU - Matias‐Guiu, Jordi A.
AU - Masson‐Trottier, Michèle
AU - Meinzer, Marcus
AU - McGowan, Ellen
AU - Mendez‐Orellana, Carolina
AU - Meyer, Aaron M.
AU - Millanski, Carly
AU - Montagut, Núria
AU - Mooney, Aimee
AU - Morhardt, Darby J.
AU - Nickels, Lyndsey
AU - Norvik, Monica
AU - Nowenstein, Iris Edda
AU - Paplikar, Avanthi
AU - Pozzebon, Margaret
AU - Renard, Antoine
AU - Ruggero, Leanne
AU - Rogalski, Emily
AU - Rysop, Anna U.
AU - Aronsson, Fredrik Sand
AU - Suárez‐González, Aida
AU - Savage, Sharon
AU - Thi, Mai Tran
PY - 2024/11/13
Y1 - 2024/11/13
N2 - AbstractINTRODUCTION Interventions to treat speech‐language difficulties in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) often use word accuracy as a highly comparable outcome. However, there are more constructs of importance to people with PPA that have received less attention. METHODS Following Core Outcome Set Standards for Development Recommendations (COSSTAD), this study comprised: Stage 1 – systematic review to identify measures; Stage 2 – consensus groups to identify important outcome constructs for people with PPA (n = 82) and care partners (n = 91); Stage 3 – e‐Delphi consensus with 57 researchers. RESULTS The systematic review identified 84 Outcome Measurement Instruments. Core outcome constructs identified included: (1) Participate in conversations with family and friends, (2) get words out, (3) be more fluent, (4) convey a message by any means, and (5) understand what others are saying. Researchers were unable to reach a consensus on measurement instruments.DISCUSSION Further work is required to develop appropriate measurement instruments that address all core outcome constructs important to key stakeholders. Highlights We introduce new symptom‐led perspectives on primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The focus is on non‐fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) and semantic (svPPA) variants. Foregrounding of early and non‐verbal features of PPA and clinical trajectories is featured. We introduce a symptom‐led staging scheme for PPA. We propose a prototype for a functional impairment scale, the PPA Progression Planning Aid.
AB - AbstractINTRODUCTION Interventions to treat speech‐language difficulties in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) often use word accuracy as a highly comparable outcome. However, there are more constructs of importance to people with PPA that have received less attention. METHODS Following Core Outcome Set Standards for Development Recommendations (COSSTAD), this study comprised: Stage 1 – systematic review to identify measures; Stage 2 – consensus groups to identify important outcome constructs for people with PPA (n = 82) and care partners (n = 91); Stage 3 – e‐Delphi consensus with 57 researchers. RESULTS The systematic review identified 84 Outcome Measurement Instruments. Core outcome constructs identified included: (1) Participate in conversations with family and friends, (2) get words out, (3) be more fluent, (4) convey a message by any means, and (5) understand what others are saying. Researchers were unable to reach a consensus on measurement instruments.DISCUSSION Further work is required to develop appropriate measurement instruments that address all core outcome constructs important to key stakeholders. Highlights We introduce new symptom‐led perspectives on primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The focus is on non‐fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) and semantic (svPPA) variants. Foregrounding of early and non‐verbal features of PPA and clinical trajectories is featured. We introduce a symptom‐led staging scheme for PPA. We propose a prototype for a functional impairment scale, the PPA Progression Planning Aid.
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.14362
U2 - 10.1002/alz.14362
DO - 10.1002/alz.14362
M3 - Article
SN - 1552-5260
JO - Alzheimer's & Dementia
JF - Alzheimer's & Dementia
ER -