An international survey of toric contact lens prescribing

Philip B. Morgan, Nathan Efron, Craig A. Woods

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    OBJECTIVES:: To characterize toric contact lens prescribing worldwide. METHODS:: Up to 1,000 survey forms were sent to contact lens fitters in up to 39 countries between January and March every year for 5 consecutive years (2007-2011). Practitioners were asked to record data relating to the first 10 contact lens fits or refits performed after receiving the survey form. Only data for toric and spherical soft lens fits were analyzed. Survey data collected since 1996 were also analyzed for 7 nations to assess toric lens fitting trends since that time. RESULTS:: Data were collected in relation to 21,150 toric fits (25%) and 62,150 spherical fits (75%). Toric prescribing ranged from 6% of lenses in Russia to 48% in Portugal. Compared with spherical fittings, toric fittings can be characterized as follows: older age (29.8 ± 11.4 years vs. 27.6 ± 10.8 years for spherical lenses); men are overrepresented (38% vs. 34%); greater proportion of new fits (39% vs. 32%); use of silicone hydrogel lenses (49% vs. 39%); and lower proportion of daily disposable lenses (14% vs. 28%). There has been a continuous increase in toric lens prescribing between 1996 and 2011. The proportion of toric lens fits was positively related to the gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita for year 2011 (r = 0.21; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS:: At the present time, in the majority of countries surveyed, toric soft contact lens prescribing falls short of that required to correct clinically significant astigmatism (≥0.75 diopters) in all lens wearers. © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)132-137
    Number of pages5
    JournalEye and Contact Lens
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013


    Dive into the research topics of 'An international survey of toric contact lens prescribing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this