An Investigation of the "jumping to conclusions" data-gathering bias and paranoid thoughts in asperger syndrome

Claire Jänsch, Dougal Julian Hare

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The existence of a data-gathering bias, in the form of jumping to conclusions, and links to paranoid ideation was investigated in Asperger syndrome (AS). People with AS (N = 30) were compared to a neurotypical control group (N = 30) on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes and the Beads tasks, with self-report measures of depression, general anxiety, social anxiety, self-consciousness and paranoid ideation. The AS group performed less well than the control group on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task with regard to accuracy but responded more quickly and tended to make decisions on the basis of less evidence on the Beads Task with 50 % demonstrating a clear 'jumping to conclusions bias', whereas none of the control group showed such a bias. Depression and general anxiety were associated with paranoid ideation but not data-gathering style, which was contrary to expectation. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)111-119
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Anxiety
    • Asperger syndrome
    • Depressions
    • Jumping to conclusions
    • Paranoia
    • Reasoning biases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An Investigation of the "jumping to conclusions" data-gathering bias and paranoid thoughts in asperger syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this