An investigation of the validity of ‘simulated’ work related tasks in relation to ‘real life’ situations in the fire service training environment.

Jacqueline Oldham, S Schofield, M J Callaghan, J Winstanley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many researchers have developed work simulated tasks that can successfully predict fitness for work. In the fire service there are few tests available to make such predictions. This study was designed to evaluate the validity of four simulated fire-fighting tasks developed by Manchester Fire Service. Twenty-seven subjects each performed, in random order, three repeats of four simulated and four real-life tasks: under-running a 9 m ladder, dead lift, placing a 13.5 m ladder on an appliance and hauling an extended line. Comparisons between real and simulated tasks were assessed by measuring total time and amount of muscle activity. Recommendations were made to reduce the weight and to revise the lifting and grip positions for the 13.5 m ladder and dead lift, respectively, whereas the simulated 9 m ladder and hauling an extended line simulated tasks were sufficiently similar to the real-life activities to not warrant any change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-607
JournalOccupational Medicine
Volume50
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An investigation of the validity of ‘simulated’ work related tasks in relation to ‘real life’ situations in the fire service training environment.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this