Abstract
Objective: Consultants employed by the NHS in England are allowed to undertake private practice to supplement their NHS income. Until the introduction of a new contract from October 2003, those employed on full-time contracts were allowed to earn private incomes no greater than 10% of their NHS income. In this paper we investigate the magnitude and determinants of consultants' NHS and private incomes. Design: Quantitative analysis of financial data. Setting: A unique, anonymized, non-disclosive dataset derived from tax returns for a sample of 24,407 consultants (92.3% of the total) in England for the financial year 2003/4. Main outcome methods: The conditional mean total, NHS and private incomes earned by age group, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. Results: The mean annual total, NHS and private incomes across all consultants in 2003/4 were £110,773, £76,628 and £34,144, respectively. Incomes varied by age, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. The ratio of mean private to NHS income for consultants employed on a full-time contract was 0.26. The mean private income across specialties ranged from £5,144 (for paediatric neurology) to £142,723 (plastic surgery). There was a positive association between mean private income and NHS waiting lists across specialties. Conclusions: Consultants employed on full-time contracts on average exceeded the limits on private income stipulated by the 10% rule. Specialty is a more important determinant of income than the region in which the consultant works. Further work is required to explore the association between mean private income and waiting lists.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 372-380 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of consultants' NHS and private incomes in England in 2003/4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver