Animalism and deferentialism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Animalism is the theory that we are animals: in other words, that each of us is numerically identical to an animal. An alternative theory maintains that we are not animals but that each of us is constituted by an animal. Call this alternative theory neo-Lockean constitutionalism or Lockeanism for short. Stephan Blatti (2012) offers to advance the debate between animalism and Lockeanism by providing a new argument for animalism. In this note, we present our own objection to Blatti's argument, and argue that Carl Gillett's earlier reply misses the fundamental problem. We also use Blatti's argument to illustrate a common methodological error, namely, uncritical deference to best theories from other disciplines. © 2014 The Authors dialectica © 2014 Editorial Board of dialectica.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)605-609
Number of pages4
JournalDialectica
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Animalism and deferentialism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this