TY - JOUR
T1 - Apparent diffusion coefficient is highly reproducible on preclinical imaging systems
T2 - Evidence from a seven-center multivendor study
AU - Doblas, Sabrina
AU - Almeida, Gilberto S.
AU - Blé, François Xavier
AU - Garteiser, Philippe
AU - Hoff, Benjamin A.
AU - McIntyre, Dominick J O
AU - Wachsmuth, Lydia
AU - Chenevert, Thomas L.
AU - Faber, Cornelius
AU - Griffiths, John R.
AU - Jacobs, Andreas H.
AU - Morris, David M.
AU - O'Connor, James P B
AU - Robinson, Simon P.
AU - Van Beers, Bernard E.
AU - Waterton, John C.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Purpose To evaluate between-site agreement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. Materials and Methods A miniaturized thermally stable ice-water phantom was devised. ADC (mean and interquartile range) was measured over several days, on 4.7T, 7T, and 9.4T Bruker, Agilent, and Magnex small-animal MRI systems using a common protocol across seven sites. Day-to-day repeatability was expressed as percent variation of mean ADC between acquisitions. Cross-site reproducibility was expressed as 1.96 × standard deviation of percent deviation of ADC values. Results ADC measurements were equivalent across all seven sites with a cross-site ADC reproducibility of 6.3%. Mean day-to-day repeatability of ADC measurements was 2.3%, and no site was identified as presenting different measurements than others (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P = 0.02, post-hoc test n.s.). Between-slice ADC variability was negligible and similar between sites (P = 0.15). Mean within-region-of-interest ADC variability was 5.5%, with one site presenting a significantly greater variation than the others (P = 0.0013). Conclusion Absolute ADC values in preclinical studies are comparable between sites and equipment, provided standardized protocols are employed.
AB - Purpose To evaluate between-site agreement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. Materials and Methods A miniaturized thermally stable ice-water phantom was devised. ADC (mean and interquartile range) was measured over several days, on 4.7T, 7T, and 9.4T Bruker, Agilent, and Magnex small-animal MRI systems using a common protocol across seven sites. Day-to-day repeatability was expressed as percent variation of mean ADC between acquisitions. Cross-site reproducibility was expressed as 1.96 × standard deviation of percent deviation of ADC values. Results ADC measurements were equivalent across all seven sites with a cross-site ADC reproducibility of 6.3%. Mean day-to-day repeatability of ADC measurements was 2.3%, and no site was identified as presenting different measurements than others (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P = 0.02, post-hoc test n.s.). Between-slice ADC variability was negligible and similar between sites (P = 0.15). Mean within-region-of-interest ADC variability was 5.5%, with one site presenting a significantly greater variation than the others (P = 0.0013). Conclusion Absolute ADC values in preclinical studies are comparable between sites and equipment, provided standardized protocols are employed.
KW - apparent diffusion coefficient
KW - imaging biomarker
KW - preclinical MRI
KW - repeatability
KW - reproducibility
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955659811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.24955
DO - 10.1002/jmri.24955
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84955659811
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 42
SP - 1759
EP - 1764
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 6
ER -