Are Online Political Influencers Accelerating Democratic Deconsolidation? Comparing the Role of Established and New Campaign Actors in the U.S. 2020 Presidential Election

Rachel Gibson, Esmeralda V. Bon, Philipp Darius, Peter Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Social media campaigning is increasingly linked with anti-democratic outcomes, with concerns to date centring on paid adverts, rather than organic content produced by a new set of online political influencers. This study systematically compares voter exposure to these new campaign actors with candidate‐sponsored ads, as well as established and alternative news sources during the US 2020 presidential election. Specifically, we examine how far higher exposure to these sources is linked with key trends identified in the democratic deconsolidation thesis. We use data from a national YouGov survey designed to measure digital campaign exposure to test our hypotheses. Findings show that while higher exposure to online political influencers is linked to more extremist opinions, followers are not disengaging from conventional politics. Exposure to paid political ads, however, is confirmed as a potential source of growing distrust in political institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175 - 186
Number of pages12
JournalMedia and Communication
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • democratic deconsolidation
  • digital campaigning
  • micro-influencers
  • online election
  • online influencers
  • social media

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Cathie Marsh Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Online Political Influencers Accelerating Democratic Deconsolidation? Comparing the Role of Established and New Campaign Actors in the U.S. 2020 Presidential Election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this