Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications

Emily A. Holmes, Richard J. Brown, Warren Mansell, R. Pasco Fearon, Elaine C M Hunter, Frank Frasquilho, David A. Oakley

    Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

    Abstract

    This review aims to clarify the use of the term 'dissociation' in theory, research and clinical practice. Current psychiatric definitions of dissociation are contrasted with recent conceptualizations that have converged on a dichotomy between two qualitatively different phenomena: 'detachment' and 'compartmentalization'. We review some evidence for this distinction within the domains of phenomenology, factor analysis of self-report scales and experimental research. Available evidence supports the distinction but more controlled evaluations are needed. We conclude with recommendations for future research and clinical practice, proposing that using this dichotomy can lead to clearer case formulation and an improved choice of treatment strategy. Examples are provided within Depersonalization Disorder, Conversion Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-23
    Number of pages22
    JournalClinical Psychology Review
    Volume25
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

    Keywords

    • Amnesia
    • Compartmentalization
    • Detachment
    • Dissociation
    • Dissociative
    • PTSD

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this