Abstract
This paper argues that Sulmasy and Sugarman have not succeeded in showing a moral difference between withholding and withdrawing treatment. In particular, they have misunderstood historical entitlement theory, which does not automatically prefer a first occupant by just acquisition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 223-224 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1994 |