Artificial pupil versus contralateral balanced contact lens fit for presbyopia correction

Santiago García-Lázaro, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Hema Radhakrishnan, César Albarrán-Diego, Robert Montés-Micó

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: To assess and compare the effects of contact lens-based artificial pupil design and contralateral balanced multifocal contact lens combination (CBMCLC) on visual performance. Methods: This randomized crossover study conducted at the University of Valencia, Spain included 38 presbyopic patients using an artificial pupil contact lens in the nondominant eye and a CBMCLC. After a month of lens wear, the binocular distance visual acuity (BDVA), binocular near visual acuity (BNVA), defocus curve, binocular distance, and near contrast sensitivity and near stereoacuity (NSA) were measured under photopic conditions (85 cd/m2). Moreover, BDVA and binocular distance contrast sensitivity were examined under mesopic conditions (5 cd/m2). Results: Visual acuity at an intermediate distance and near vision was better with the CBMCLC than with the artificial pupil (p
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)76-80
    Number of pages4
    JournalArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
    Volume77
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • Contact lenses
    • Presbyopia/rehabilitation
    • Prosthesis fitting dominance, ocular
    • Pupil

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial pupil versus contralateral balanced contact lens fit for presbyopia correction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this